Existing children of a surrogate mother must be psychologically assessed, court rules

Court sets out new guidelines for surrogacy agreements. Photo: Getty Images

Court sets out new guidelines for surrogacy agreements. Photo: Getty Images

  • The existing children of a woman who agrees to act as a surrogate must be psychologically assessed before an agreement can be sanctioned, the High Court has ruled.
  • This is among new guidelines for surrogacy agreements that come to court for approval.
  • Current guidelines include that a surrogate mother must have a documented history of at least one pregnancy, a “viable delivery”, and a living child of her own.

The existing children of a woman who agrees to a surrogate pregnancy must be psychologically assessed before an agreement can be sanctioned.

According to a recent ruling by Judge Brenda Neukircher at the High Court in Pretoria, this is according to a recent order.

In her ruling, Judge Neukircher laid down further guidelines for surrogacy agreements before the courts for approval. Some of the guidelines are in the Constitutionally-entrenched principle of the child’s “best interest”.

Read: ‘Not possible’: Legal expert explains rules around ‘multiple’ surrogates in South Africa

Judge Neukircher ruled, “Were it to be found that the surrogacy may hurt their psychological well-being, this would be a factor that a court would be able to weigh up in consideration of whether the agreement should be confirmed.”

Setting out the history of surrogacy laws in South Africa, Neukircher said that one provision was that a surrogate mother must have a documented history of at least one pregnancy, a “viable delivery”, and a living child of her own.

Neukircher noted the importance for the courts to consider the impact a surrogate pregnancy would have on the woman’s existing child or children.

“How does a surrogate pregnancy affect the surrogate mother’s own child/children? Bearing in mind that they watch her pregnancy for nine months, they know she is carrying a child and see her going to the hospital to deliver a baby and then coming home without a baby in her arms. Is it important that the interest of these children be protected and, if so, how does a court do that?” she stated.

The applicants in the matter before Neukircher were financially stable. They already had a ten-month-old baby born with the same surrogate mother through a previous surrogate arrangement.

Must read: ‘It’s impossible not to form a bond’ – three-time surrogate mom shares her experience

The surrogate mother had previously been a surrogate for other couples and had once given birth to twins. Neukircher said the couple had one frozen egg left and now wanted another child with the surrogate mother.

“In all respects, they function as a stable family unit, and I’m satisfied that they can care for a second child financially, emotionally, physically and educationally. Any child born of this surrogacy will have their best interests catered to in every aspect of the (Children’s Act),” the Judge said.

Turning to the surrogate mother, Judge Neukircher said she was married and had two children of her own aged ten and seven years old.

“At the time of the first surrogacy, they were six and three. Each time their mother carries a child as a surrogate, they are confronted by her pregnancy which does not end in a child being brought home to join their family. My concern was how healthy, psychologically, it is for children to go through this process?”

Also read: WATCH | US mom of three girls opts for IVF so that her next baby is a boy

Neukircher said she had ordered that expert reports be compiled on the surrogate’s physical suitability to have another child and the effect of her surrogate pregnancies on her children.

She said the report revealed that both the surrogate’s children did not want her to have more children of her own.

“Both were proud of the fact that she was helping others have a family, and it seems both have adjusted to the fact that she acts as a surrogate….they do not see [the babies] as being part of their own family….they do not want their mother to bring baby home”.

She said the “invaluable report” highlighted the importance that the children of surrogate mothers needed to be prepared for the pregnancy, which goes a long way to alleviating any possible anxiety”.

The Judge said lawyers for both the commissioning parents and the surrogate mother and her husband had agreed that in not requiring such expert reports, the legislature had overlooked the “best interests” principle when it came to existing children.

She said the Act laid down compliance factors for surrogacy agreements, including that a court must consider all concerned’s circumstances and family situations.

Going forward, Neukircher said, this must include an assessment of children already born. In this matter, she granted an order confirming the agreement.

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Read the original on GroundUp here.